RFP No. 26-29 - PCDC - Food Service Management Commissary Addendum No. 1 - Q&As

Description

PUEBLO COUNTY PURCHASING 215 WEST 10TH STREET, ROOM 14 PUEBLO, CO 81003 Telephone: (719) 583-6097 purchasing@pueblocounty.us ADDENDUM NO. 1 COUNTY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO RFP No. 26-29 - PC Detention Center Food Service Management Commissary Date: 10/9/26 What the Change is being done to the current RFP: Question and Responses The proposer shall permanently affix this Addendum No. 1 to the RFP packet so it will be submitted with the RFP. The undersigned proposer acknowledges receipt of this Addendum No. 1. Received by: _________________________________________ Firm Name: ___________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________ Date: ________________________________________________ Page 1 of 9 QUESTIONS & RESPONSES RFP 26-29 Kitchen & Commissary Evaluation and Scoring 1. The “Evaluation Criteria and Contract Award” section states that oral presentations/interviews are worth 25 points, while the “Evaluation” section on page 22 lists the oral presentation as worth 20 points. Please confirm the correct point value for the oral presentation component. This is an optional non-mandatory evaluation. Typically based on top 3 vendor selection. Proposal Response Requirements 2. The Table of Contents references a “Proposal Response Requirements” section beginning on page 4; however, that content does not appear to be included in the RFP as issued. Please confirm whether there are specific formatting requirements, page limits, required proposal sections or order, or additional forms beyond the signed cover sheet that proposers must follow, or provide the missing content. Appears to be an error with the table of contents. Continue with what is current listed on pg 4. Pricing and Cost Evaluation 3. The “Payment” section provides a sliding-scale price-per-meal table based on the daily inmate population. Please clarify whether this table represents a fixed rate schedule that all proposers must accept or whether proposers are expected to submit their own per-meal pricing, with the published table serving as a reference or cap. This directly affects how proposers should address the 15-point “Contract Cost Savings” evaluation criterion. Yes, the published table is a reference. Proposers should weigh their cost as part of their proposal. Current Systems and Third-Party Integrations 4.