Addendum No 3 RFP No. 2026-0064-PW

Description

Justin S. Greene Commissioner, District 1 Adam Fulton Johnson Commissioner, District 4 Lisa Cacari Stone Commissioner, District 2 Hank Hughes Commissioner, District 5 Camilla Bustamante Commissioner, District 3 Gregory S. Shaffer County Manager May 29, 2026 SANTA FE COUNTY RFP No. 2026-0064-PW/DK Water Reclamation Facility Expansion - Design-Build Project ADDENDUM NO. 3 Dear Proponents, This addendum is issued to reflect the following immediately. It shall be the responsibility of interested Offerors to adhere to any changes or revisions to the RFP as identified in this Addendum No. 3. This documentation shall become permanent and made part of the departmental files. RFP DOCUMENT REVISIONS: ❖ Section V.C.1, Phase II Proposal Format, is revised to move the Schedule from Volume II to Volume I. Volume I shall include the Technical Proposal, including the Schedule. Volume II shall include the Cost Proposal only. Section V.C.2, Phase II Evaluation Factors, is revised to state that the Schedule will be evaluated under Factor No. 2, Quality of Construction Approach. Factor No. 5 will evaluate Cost only. All point allocations remain unchanged. ❖ Phase II Proposal Submission The Phase II Proposal submission deadline has been extended. Phase II Proposals must be received no later than July 14, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Mountain Time. Dropbox Submission Link: https://www.dropbox.com/request/bw35x4eyu8sqtm8hm3a5 Attachment D: Alternative Technical Concept Meeting Procedures and Schedule 102 Grant Avenue · P.O. Box 276 · Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0276 · 505-986-6200 · FAX: 505-995-2740 www.santafecountynm.gov Question No. 1: MACC Responsiveness/Funding Section II.B, Scope of Work, states that the project has a Maximum Allowable Construction Cost (MACC) of $13,000,000. Based on a preliminary review of the scope of work it appears that the required scope of work is going to exceed the MACC. Will an Offeror be deemed non-responsive if the proposed cost exceeds the MACC, or will a proposal above the MACC still be Evaluated? Answer No. 1: No. An Offeror will not be deemed nonresponsive solely because its proposed cost exceeds the MACC. Question No. 2: MACC Exceeded Limit If the total price exceeds available funding, does County intend to; revise scope, seek additional funding, negotiate, or terminate procurement? Answer No. 2: The County intends to negotiate with the highest ranked Offeror to determine whether the project can be completed within available funding.