24-03 Addendum 1 - Vendor Q&A

Description

RFP 24-03 COURSE REDESIGN KSU 118 ATTACHMENT B - VENDOR QUESTION FORM Vendors should list any questions regarding the terms and conditions set forth in RFP 22.012, OPM Services for Kentucky State University, below. Question RFP Section Number Vendor Question 1 30.26 We generally comply with WCAG 2.2 Level AA for all our digital deliverables. Please confirm if this is sufficient for KSU. WCAG 2.2 is sufficient for KSU 2 30.26 Is it mandatory to implement Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 1194, as they cover a range of ICT accessibility requirements, including those related to software applications, websites, and telecommunications? KSU prioritize accessibility requirements 3 20.1 What is the mode of conducting the training in the current scenario (self-paced online learning, in-person classes, discussions, assessments, assignments/projects, and so on)? Please mention the contact hours/notional learning time for each of the modes of teaching/learning. KSU's preferred mode is in-person classes for faculty and staff, but it recognizes that self-paced online learning could establish an annual training program for sustainability. As it relates to contact hours for student learning time per module, we will invite consultants to establish and adopt national best practices to positively impact our student experiences. 4 General Beyond first-year and transfer students, are there specific sub-groups within these categories that the proposal should particularly focus on (e.g., non-traditional students, international students)? No 5 40.2 What specific challenges do first-year students and second-year students at KSU face? Attendance, understanding the roles and responsibilities of offices, understanding what it means to be an undergraduate student and preparation for college courses, academic planning, and the overall student experience. 6 40.2 Can you provide examples or case studies of successful first- and second-year curriculum designs that your institution considers benchmarks? Case studies that reinforces the importance of a sense of belonging within the University and academic programs. Also case studies that leverage high impact practices to promote active and deep learning through student engagements particularly project based outcomes.