002 - Seawall Replacement Project Addendum No. 2

Description

SECTION 00900 Addendum No. 2 (June 9, 2014) to Contract Documents Town of Surfside Surfside Seawall Replacement TOWN RFP No. 2014-003 CGA PROJECT No. 12-5247 To All Bidders: Bidders for the above-referenced project shall take note of the following changes, additions, deletions, clarifications, etc. to the Plans and Specifications, which in accordance with the Contract Documents shall become a part of and have precedence over anything shown or described otherwise. IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: 1. Attached RFI Responses is to be added to the Contract Documents. All other documents, specifications, drawings, terms and conditions remain the same. Bidders must acknowledge receipt of Addendum on Page 00300-4 in Section 00300. END OF SECTION 05/14 Addendum No.2 00900-1 12-5247 Responses to RFI for Addendum No.2 TOWN OF SURFSIDE Seawall Replacement Project Town RFP No. 2014-003 CGA Project No. 12-5247 June 9, 2013 1.) Reference: General Question: The large black chain link fence in the Surfside Park is most likely going to have to be removed and replaced or reinstall. Is this going to be included in the scope of the contractor or the Town of Surfside? Response: If the fence is required to be removed, it will need to be replaced or reinstalled to as good or better condition, at the Contractor’s expense. 2.) Reference: General Questions: Is it acceptable for the contractor to utilize the 92nd street end for storage of aggregate and lay down? Response: Although the street ends are public right of way, they are utilized as residential access to their driveways. Although minimal storage may be permitted, the exact locations size and extents of the area permitted for storage will need to be requested by the Contractor, reviewed by the Owner and confirmed in writing. 3.) Reference: Request Question: Please provide soil borings B8 and B10. Response: Soil borings were not performed at these locations due to the presence of FPL utilities in the vicinity of the seawalls. 4.) Reference: Addendum, Answer to question No. 1 Request: To clarify the 10ea test pile required on the project will be Static Load Pile Test? If static load test are to be used a working load must be given to calculate the reaction frame requirements, please provide the working loads? PDA testing is an easier and more economical alternative to the static load test. Can the static load test be replaced with a PDA test? Response: Contractor may replace the Static Load Pile Test with PDA testing.